tragedy strikes the enterprise
Tag: reblog
Untitled
The most beautiful scene out of the entire series.
I cried like a bitch
okay social justice wario is indeed the best blog on this site
Okay, at first, I didn’t like him. The oppressed white male alert klaxon went off in my head, constantly telling myself that I had it just as rough as everyone else, this person should not even be talking, yadda blahblahblahblah
But then, something clicks. Like a switch. And then, late one night, I come to a conclusion.
It’s Wario.
It’s just fucking Wario.
And that’s the best part of the whole thing. The sheer audacity and vulgarity of the portly plumber, but with social justice flavouring. The whole idea, maybe just a misspelling gone wrong, has evolved into one of the most popular blogs on tumblr, and for many a good reason.
SJW is this fucking bullet train of wake-up calls, barrelling into the internet at 120 mph, with no intention of stopping.
And the reactions! Oh good god. There’s this whole LEGION of people who are dedicated to invent persecution to spite SJW. Nearly an entire subreddit has been filled with endless negative dissections of SJW’s posts. People have made MORE tumblrs for the exact purpose of insulting this one blog.
And that’s what I love about it. Think about it. Wario (in the games) has lost several times. He’s lost in the intros, matchups, popularity polls, etc. And now it’s Wario’s turn to win. He even says it once a page. It’s almost a story of it’s own.
TL;DR: Social Justice Wario is the greatest blog on this site.
WAHAAAHAHAHAHA! WARIO THE WINNER!
Untitled
“How to Open a Can without a Can Opener"The single most useful thing I have ever learned from youtube. Damn.
whaaaaaaaaaat
what Doctor Who needs to do
- kick out Steven Moffat
- make Jenna Louise Coleman the doctor
THAT would be a decent fucking twist.
Untitled
[rebloggable by request]
Well, first of all, WELCOME TO ONE OF MY PET PEEVES.
A female character does not have to be “strong” (whatever your definition of that is) to be a good character.
Women can be strong, or wussy, or emotional, or stoic, or needy, or independent, and still be legitimate people and interesting characters.
In our totally understandable desire to see portrayals of strong women (in reaction to decades of damsels in distress and women as appendages), we’ve somehow backed ourselves into this corner where the only acceptable portrayal of a woman in the media is a strong, kick-ass woman. That is not doing women any favors. It just leads to the attitude that you have to be ONE WAY ONLY to be legit as a woman. You shouldn’t have to be Natasha Romanoff or Xena to be considered a good character. Don’t get me wrong, I love a good Buffy as much as the next person, but that should not be the only acceptable portrayal. It should be okay for a female character NOT to be strong, too. Let’s take Molly Hooper as an example. She is not the stereotypical “strong” woman. But hell, she went through medical school, didn’t she? She’s smart, and she’s funny, and she serves a story function – she is not a major character, but she doesn’t have to be. But her character gets criticized because she pines after Sherlock. What, you never pined after somebody? Did it make you invalid as a person? You never got a bit silly over a crush? I know I did. And I still consider myself a strong woman. It should be okay for Molly to have a crush on Sherlock without getting the “oh, she’s so pathetic, what a terrible example, what a horrible female character” thing she so often gets. Yes, because it’s so terrible that a female character should reflect an experience that like 99% of us have had.
Screw writing “strong” women. Write interesting women. Write well-rounded women. Write complicated women. Write a woman who kicks ass, write a woman who cowers in a corner. Write a woman who’s desperate for a husband. Write a woman who doesn’t need a man. Write women who cry, women who rant, women who are shy, women who don’t take no shit, women who need validation and women who don’t care what anybody thinks. THEY ARE ALL OKAY, and all those things could exist in THE SAME WOMAN. Women shouldn’t be valued because we are strong, or kick-ass, but because we are people. So don’t focus on writing characters who are strong. Write characters who are people.
The only bad female character, if you ask me (and you did), is one who’s flat. One who isn’t realistic. One who has no agency of her own, who only exists to define other characters (usually men). Write each woman you write as if she has her own life story, her own motivations, her own fears and strengths, and even if she’s only in the story for one page, she will be a real person, and THAT is what we need. Not a phalanx of women who can karate-chop your head off, but REAL women, who are people, with all the complexity and strong and not-strong that goes with it.
This is why I disagree with the “damsel in distress” criticism of Irene in the last scene of Scandal. Here’s the thing about being a damsel in distress…it’s only bad if that’s all she is. If the character’s defining characteristic is being a damsel in distress, that’s bad. But if an otherwise complex character with lots of other agency and actions happens to be in distress, then…that’s all it is. She is in distress. That happens. Characters are often in distress, or there would be no plots. Should a female character never be allowed to be in distress, at ALL, to be valid? No.
A strong female character is one who is defined by her own characteristics, history and personality, and not solely by the actions or needs of other characters. She is a person in the story, not a prop. That is the best definition I can come up with. Note that my definition did not involve martial arts.
That was probably longer than you were anticipating! I’ve had that percolating for a long time.
I’ve seen the “Screw writing strong women” quotes on my dash in various gifsets for months and I only just now realized I KNOW THIS FABULOUS LADY IN MEATSPACE.
Untitled
yesterday me and another girl were explaining that most americans don’t have kettles in their kitchens to a british woman who runs a tea shop and she said “well how do you make your tea, then?” and the other girl admitted that she mostly uses the microwave and the woman clutched her hand over her heart and sat down in shock
Barbarians.
This is what my SO and his parents do (we’re Americans) and I had a similar reaction.
Untitled
christmas eve what about christmas adam
happy christmas adam to all men’s rights activists
Please stop pestering us with things like this. This has nothing to do with men fighting for their rights. Eve is short for ‘evening’. Please don’t turn activism into a joke. Thanks.
Someone isn’t having a good christmas adam
Christmas Adam: December 23rd. Comes before Christmas Eve and is generally unsatisfying.
Uh, excuse me, but today is already Festivus.
Thanks for excluding the rest of us.


























